Cam 11 Test 2 Writing Task 1
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts compare the percentage of British students in a university who could communicate in different languages in two years, 2000 and 2010.
Overall, students in this university who were able to speak English only accounted for the highest proportion. Furthermore, the percentage of British students who were multilingual increased after 10 years.
In 2000, 30% of students were capable of using the mother tongue only, followed by 20% who could speak Spanish. The percentages of students using French or another language were equal, at 15%, while 10% of participants could interact in French or two other languages.
After a decade, English-speaking students still dominated in this school, with 35% of them using this language only, compared to a rise of 5% in the proportions of another or two other language speakers. French and Spanish users, however, occupied lower percentages in 2010, with its figure declining by 5% each. Only the percentage of German speakers stayed static over time.
(162 words)
Gợi ý sách liên quan
Giải đề thi thật IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2
Nếu bạn muốn tham khảo các bài mẫu IELTS Writing bám sát với đề thi thật nhất, thuộc những chủ đề thường được hỏi trong IELTS Writing Task 2, sở hữu cuốn này chính là sự lựa chọn tuyệt vời.

Cam 11 Test 2 Writing Task 2
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
It is difficult to conceive sustainable economic growth without clean and healthy living conditions for people. For this reason, many suggest new legislation on household waste recycling as the only way to protect the living environment. I partly agree with this statement.
On the one hand, I concur that a law on waste recycling is a promising approach to the problems of waste from households. It is true that when a bill is adopted and made into a law, people undoubtedly pay more attention to it and take it with more serious consideration. If they know that they can be fined, punished, or even imprisoned for not obeying recycling laws, they will certainly abide by the laws and take more responsibility for classifying the waste from their homes. This will gradually form a good habit of protecting the surrounding environment among the population. For this reason, more waste from home can be recycled, contributing to a cleaner environment.
On the other hand, I do not agree that this is the only measure to increase recycling because education can be equally or even more effective to solve the problem of household waste. For example, governments should have well-trained teachers impart the knowledge of how to properly recycle household waste to students. Children who receive this knowledge can recycle with a higher level of effectiveness and success than those who do not. Another reason why I do not agree with this new law is that this policy is impractical to low-income families who are already struggling with many problems in their life. A law on treating waste from their homes just places a heavier burden and greater anxiety on them.
In conclusion, the introduction of a new law on treating waste from homes can be an effective measure to some extent, but this would certainly not be the only way and not a feasible measure to unstable income families.
(321 words)
Bài viết liên quan:
- Giải đề IELTS Writing Cambridge 11 Test 1 (full 2 tasks)
- Giải đề IELTS Writing Cambridge 11 Test 3 (full 2 tasks)
- Giải đề IELTS Writing Cambridge 11 Test 4 (full 2 tasks)
IELTS Thanh Loan – Trung tâm luyện thi IELTS cung cấp các khóa học IELTS Online, sách IELTS:
- ĐT: 0974 824 724
- Email: hi@ielts-thanhloan.com
- Địa chỉ: S103 Vinhomes Smart City, Tây Mỗ, Nam Từ Liêm, Hà Nội